HTB1TmifKpXXXXXmaXXXq6xXFXXX7/water-filter-for-household-3-8-GAC-UDF-activated-carbon-water-purifier-remove-chlorine-charcoal-for.jpg' alt='Can Activated Carbon Remove Chlorine' title='Can Activated Carbon Remove Chlorine' />Citizens Concerned About Chloramine CCACCitizens Concerned About Chloramine CCAC.Welcome to the website of Citizens Concerned About Chloramine CCAC, a nonprofit organization based in the San Francisco Bay Area, California.CCAC Vice President Linda Corwin, left, and President Denise Johnson Kula, right, speak to a group of citizens in Pacifica, CA about chloramine in the water supply.Contents of Home Page click on an item News Items Officials end consideration of chloramines for water treatment in Charlottesville Albemarles water supply Virginia.Can Activated Carbon Remove Chlorine' title='Can Activated Carbon Remove Chlorine' />July 2.Tulsa City Council Requests Delay in Switch to Chloramine.The Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority TMUA plans to switch to chloramine to meet EPA standards for disinfection byproducts.On October 2.Tulsa, Oklahoma City Council heard a presentation on chloramine by Robert Bowcock of Integrated Resource Management, a consulting firm involved in water related issues.Using Activated Carbon in the Aquarium.Activated carbon is used quite commonly as part of the filtration system in aquaria, but there are many myths and.His experience includes working as a water utility manager, and designing and constructing water treatment and distribution systems.He works with environmental advocate and attorney Erin Brockovich.In his presentation, he pointed out the disadvantages of chloramine and suggested alternative ways to meet the EPA standards.After the presentation, the council requested by a vote of 7 2 that the TMUA delay the planned switch, to allow time for Robert Bowcock to meet with TMUA to consider alternatives to chloramine.See a video of the Tulsa City Council meeting, October 2.The TMUA meeting on December 1.At the meeting, Robert Bowcock argued that the city can extend the use of its existing granular activated carbon system, rather than switch to chloramine.Chloramine in South Carolina.See a November 1.Tap Water Running A Risk WSPA News Channel 7 in South Carolina, reporting that Michelle Andersons stomach cramps and rashes disappeared after years of suffering.She discovered her water contained chloramine so stopped using it.Also included.EPA and leading allergists and dermatologistsinterviews with water officials in South Carolina who use chloraminean interview with Dr.Michael Plewa who studies nitrosamines such as NDMA, disinfection byproducts of chloramines that are not currently regulated but, in his opinion, should be because of their toxicitypotentially much more serious than stomach cramps and rashesa report on the state of Tennessee which requires having free chlorine in water systems, and chooses not to use chloramine because there is too much unknown about it.Spill of Chloraminated Drinking Water into Polhemus Creek Kills Steelhead Trout.Read the article, Utility fined for spilling chemicals into Polhemus Creek, killing steelhead trout by Julia Scott, which appeared in the San Mateo County Times on May 3.Following are some excerpts.Thats the funny thing People think of drinking water as not being a problem, but when you see the reaction with the species in the creek you realize it can be toxic, said Dyan Whtye, assistant executive officer at the Regional Water Quality Control Board.The spills occurred Sept.Sept.The. first lasted 4.It was only after SFPUC biologists began noticing the.Cal Water about the magnitude of.For more on chloramine fish kills, see Effects on the Environment.SFPUC Citizens Advisory Committee Urges Scientific Testing of the Immediate, Acute, and Long Term Health Effects of Chloramine.The Water Subcommittee of the Citizens Advisory Committee CAC of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission SFPUC drafted a resolution on chloramine disinfection, and passed it by the full CAC on November 1.Some excerpts.WHEREAS, no agency, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency USEPA, has done scientific studies to determine whether chloramine, when used as a secondary disinfectant, might cause adverse skin, respiratory, or digestive effects in human beings and.WHEREAS, there have not been epidemiological or other scientific studies on the dermal, respiratory, and digestive effects of human exposure to chloraminated drinking water, even as the use of chloramine for secondary disinfection is increasing in the United States and.BE IT RESOLVED that the SFPUC Citizens Advisory Committee urges the SFPUC and.San Francisco Department of Health SFDPH to petition the United States.Environmental Protection Agency USEPA to conduct scientific testing of the.To see the full text of the resolution, and a letter sent by the SFPUC to the EPA dated March 1.To see a follow up letter from Citizens Concerned About Chloramine to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson dated May 1.Citizens Testify Before the SFPUC on Health Effects of Chloramine.To see a video of the February 2.San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, click on the following.Media.Player. php The chloramine related portion of the meeting is item 1.New Research Chloramine Disinfection Byproducts More Toxic Than Those of Chlorine.New research published in 2.Dr.Michael Plewa, a professor at the University of Illinois, shows that the disinfection byproducts DBPs created from the use of chloramine are much more toxic than the DBPs of chlorine.These new nitrogen containing DBPs are currently not regulated by the EPA.They are in California water supplies and he recommends that water agencies switch back to chlorine.See the article Anna Eshoo takes up chloramine question by Daniel De.Bolt.Also see the abstract for the research paper on haloacetonitriles by Dr.Plewa and others.CCAC Meets with Federal Lawmakers to have Chloramine Removed From the Water Supply.CCAC is meeting with all federal lawmakers in the San Francisco Bay Area to ask the EPA to stop using chloramine as our water disinfectanct, and return to the use of chlorine.On July 3, 2.CCAC met with the staff of U.Buy Gold In Installments Bangalore University . Direct Tv Dvr Hack Hdd . S. Representative Anna Eshoo.Her staff initiated a congressional research service investigation of the matter and confirmed that there are no skin, respiratory, digestive including food exposure, or epidemiologic studies on chloramine.She also arranged a meeting between CCAC and the state EPA on September 5 to discuss the possibility of a waiver to return to the use of chlorine.Staff from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the San Francisco Public Health Department, and the state health department also attended.See the Article Archive for Anna Eshoo takes up chloramine question by Daniel De.Bolt, which appeared in The Almanac Menlo Park on August 2.CCAC gave a presentation on chloramine to U.S.Representative Tom Lantos and his staff on August 3.CCAC also met with the staffs of.Representative Zoe Lofgren on September 1.Representative Ellen Tauscher on September 1.Representative Pete Stark on September 1.Representative Mike Honda on September 2.Meetings with other lawmakers, both federal and state, are being arranged.CCAC recommends that all those affected by and concerned about chloramine contact their federal and state lawmakers, including U.S.Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein.National Effort.An environmentalist group from Vermont, Vermonters for a Clean Environment VCE, along with Vermont People Concerned About Chloramine PCAC, have joined CCAC in the national effort to challenge EPA regulations.Following are quotes from a letter to VCE about health effects from chloramination.Dr.David Ozonoff, Professor of Environmental Health and Chair Emeritus, Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health.A close temporal relationship between the treatment change and the complaints of water users strongly suggests that one is the cause of the other.At the same time that a water supply is an efficient means to deliver a health giving substance, it is also an efficient means to distribute harmful ones.In any event, health complaints from water users attendant upon any treatment change are a red flag and need attention.Vermont Senate Hearings on Chloramine.In Vermont, more than 1.People Concerned About Chloramine PCAC, a local citizens group.On March 2.Vermont Senate Committee on Health and Welfare.They questioned the Vermont Department of Health, the Champlain Water District, which provides water to about 6.PCAC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |